EASE OF MANIPULATION

No one thinks themself to be a sheep.  Easily led to perform a task.  Possibly a ridiculous and damaging task.

In my graduate class, Experimental Psychology, each student had to devise and complete a simple experiment.  Upon completion they had to explain the steps that led to the goal of the experiment.  Most experiments dealt with pets.  Teaching a dog to obey some command or having their goldfish all swim to the side of the bowl where they expected food.  A variation of Pavlov’s fish.

My wife was in this class with me.  She was a class favorite.  She was sweet and bright and everyone liked her.  She and the class were amazed when I announced that I trained my wife to kiss me when she came home from work.  It was a cute and successful demonstration of how easy it could be to manipulate another’s behavior.  In this case for a good purpose.

Choosing an experiment might have another, more nefarious, purpose.  As an example can something occur that will allow someone (one of those evil James Bond foils who want to take over the world) to get people, people in every country, to stay locked up in their house, not congregate, stop protesting and become afraid for their future.

Oh yeah, like a plandemic.  To see if people could be steered into a behavior without being able to validate the level of severity.  Of course, this could only occur with effective mass communication.  This simply means that in the 17th century there existed no way to effectively communicate information that could cause fear let alone such a drastic economic disaster.  But with today’s internet and political climate this could easily be done.

So the purveyors of such a deed (cabal/illuminati/deep state/luciferians…) have tested the weakness of the the sheeple.  What is the next step in the experiment?

I have an experiment that might test the limits of sheeple behavior.  Release a manmade virus that is airborne.  Butt only after it goes through the human intestine.  It would be released as a gas, flatulence – fart if you will.  There are no signs, such as temperature, sneeze or cough.  The sneeze could be silent.. But the odor when detected would be too late.  The offending virus would be blown throughout the air stream.

Before you dismiss this idea as crass and ridiculous think of the science of thought behind this.  The fear in the masses. The money to be made.

Shortly after the discovery of the method of transmission of the latest deadly virus a cure is found.  Initially people were wearing leather pants.  Poor people were wearing rather large face masks about their derriers. Countries went on diets. Bean-o stock went sky high.

The cure was found by Bill Gates.  He just so happened to have millions of MASSKS in a ware house.  They were rather costly because of the special charcoal and the ability to repels less than one micron of this gas particle.  The MAASK was so effective at holding the deadly gas in that a special fume absorbing relief valve was added.  This kept the shape normal but added significantly to the life saving cost of the device,

The MAASK came in a variety of shapes, colors and designs.  An elite design (by Eddie Bauer) could contour your  posterior to a more perkier past.

Capitalism came to the rescue.  Dr. Fauci developed and designed a version simply called the ASS MASK.  Deborah Birx had a more masculine design called the ASS REFLECTOR. It was great to see scientists so interested in helping others.

GOAL ACHIEVED

The goal of this experiment was a success.  The goal was simply to have people sit on their ass and do nothing.  People were unwilling to discuss their expression of symptoms.

It is clear by this experiment the ease at which a population can be led.  The next step will be a crushing blow to humanity.  Like all great studies a silver lining might emerge.  Possibly an alien invasion will be thrust upon us.  Without proper forethought by the black hats the aliens might  succumb to the deadly gas.

Isn’t experimental psychology fun?

I am fascinated with how people think.  Not that a person disagrees with me but rather how they don’t or can’t interpret what I interpret.  For example, let’s take the obvious and overt lies spewed by John Brennan.  His own words do not comport with previous statements, written memos, reports, testimony and emails.

So an individual might agree that he is lying.  Let’s say they don’t spin it and excuse these statements as mistakes, misinterpretations or misreporting.  Let’s assume we can agree these are false statements – LIES.

Let’s add that these lies all appear to have a purpose.  He is lying for a reason.  He is trying to prevent you from learning something.

Compare and contrast his lies with President Trump’s statements. They are diametrically opposite.  Since we know Brennan is lying we have a reason to suspect that President Trump is telling the truth.

Add to this scenario that the news outlets support Brennan’s statements.  Actually they don’t necessarily support his statement but allow him to report his lies on air with overt acceptance.  Does that make the news media liars as well?

This scenario is not the point I am getting to.  I readily accept that both the news and Brennan are lying.  I even know why they are lying.  I know what they are concealing.  That so many refuse to see what sits before them is confusing to me.

I  have a remarkably intelligent and gifted friend who refuses to accept what I have stated above.  I want to know his logic?  I want to know why he closes his mind to a domino of facts that is obvious to me and others?

I am more interested on the thinking of Brennan.  He is cornered like a rat.  His lies have overwhelmed him.  Does he sleep?  Does he have a conscience?  Does he know he will face the death penalty?  Does he think telling a different lie will suddenly have the Justice Department say “Sorry, our bad”?

Brennan is currently the starting point of a collection of lies by a collection of people.  I hope to get into their lies from a different angle.  But Brennan’s lies are knowing lies.  He knows he is lying.  How does he go on the news station that hired him?  Do they know he is lying?  They see the same facts I do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have watched, read, viewed, discussed the systematic take down of the U.S. and the world.  This has been happening for days, weeks, months, years.  I can’t believe I watched this right before my eyes and did little.  Now we are stuck in a plandemic. When will it end?

There are somethings that are consistent.  First, the legacy media not only continues to lie, to obfuscate, to propagandize, to hyperbolize, but they do so with blatant openness.  The medias blatant lies leads to the second consistent behavior — the peoples blindness, their refusal to see.  The third consistent behavior is the real news inability to begin at the beginning.

I view all these great videos explaining what is taking place.  I see the connections made between one person and missing money or a statement made by a person that is completely ignored. Maybe too much information.  So take one piece of information and keep repeating it.  For example, Bill Gates saying the world’s population must be reduced significantly.

Possibly by repeating it, one becomes habituated to its implication.  Maybe by rephrasing  to “BG is trying to kill you”  and then rephrasing it again to “BG is trying to kill your children” and then “BG is trying to end your family”.  But as effective as that might be it misses the beginning.

There are so many players in this game that uncovering one at a time seems to add one more piece of information that weighs down one’s imagination.  Don’t get me wrong, one at a time is helpful if you tie it to the beginning.  Don’t try to put logic into the beginning.  The logic has tentacles from evil, to power, to money, to birthright. Each of the players may have a different motive for playing their part.

Every news cast should begin with something akin to “In the continuing attempt to enslave and kill you …” Each view of the takeover would have a different beginning.  For example, “In the Clinton’s continued rape of the taxpayers” or “Pelosi and Feinsteins continued attempt to steal monies from you the tax payer…”

If you have a more religious view the headline might say, “The devil and the Dems have a new plan for your future” or “Satan , the Clintons and Shumer are protecting their interests by …” A comedian might say “Satan, Pelosi and Lynch walk into Trump’s bar …”

If power is the angle of your view then the beginning headline might be “The WHO today with China announced that they have successfully duped the world through its media ownership and…”

If your lens views this from a human rights or family protection point of view the headline might read, “Pedophiles are on the run worldwide…” or “Organ harvesting has dropped to the number 2 export of China…”  If you view this from a technological viewpoint the headline might begin “As China’s 5G gears up to nano fry your thoughts…” or “Recent attack linked to message from 5G network that also connects to MGO intake…”

The point is simply don’t describe the player or the player’s deed without the beginning.  The SJW need to complain as it resonates, the blind and deaf are too far gone, the awake play too nice.  Those many that know something is wrong, those many who feel a whisper in their right ear, those many who can connect the dots to an obvious, overt conclusion, those many who can’t find a single fact to support a media statement, then begin at the beginning.