If You Understand This …

I imagine that in mankind’s early history he was surrounded by the elements that could be used to make things.  Such as stone and flint and he could make fire.  But how that was discovered can only be imagined. Think how shocked early man must have been to see a flame from two stones and small wood.  Incredible!

Since there was no telephone, how the information of this discovery spread had to have been slow.  I can see one tribe using this discovery as power over another.

Today’s fire appears conceptual.  The ingredients are there but without the physical flame modern day man seems more impaired than prehistoric man.

The US and the people of the world have been fighting over their inability to see the flint and the stone.  Let me give an example.  My older sister and I were speaking over the phone and I assumed, that being from the same family we had the same way of seeing things.  Of course that is a foolish belief but I am the baby and give way to my older sisters.

My sister had no concept that anything was wrong in the US except that the politicians were ineffective.  Her concept was not promulgated by watching  TV.  She only watched the weather channel as she believed that to be the only hard news of these times.

When I broached the subject of 911 she freaked out calling me a conspiracy theorist.  I stated that since the government killed all those people in 911 and she freaked.

Then it occurred to me that the divide in the US probably fits under a bell curve of understanding. Some people will never understand, some already understand and it is a race between the powers that be and those that want you to understand, to skew the curve to the right.

I happen to know that former President H.W. Bush is a kind and gentle man.  And as such I had difficulty in believing that he could have been part of that fateful day.  How could a kind man kill so many innocent people and ruin so many families?  Then comes Bill Clinton a sort of likable goof ball.  He raped  many women.  Then Hillary — don’t even go there.  Then Obama who lied every time he opened his mouth. What do they all have in common — the love of MONEY.

So let’s cut to the chase.  If you do not see that the US government has its fingerprints all over 911 then we can only argue about how rude and crude you think President Trump is.

You see President Trump, despite his faults, knows.  He understands.  He was elected because he is different.  He is not political and he has enough money to be satisfied. Let me clarify, that Trump was not elected because he knows and understands but because he understood the wishes of Americans.

However this is not my point.  Every discussion that has a political angle must start with, “Who do you think is involved in 911?”  Follow ups might include “Who is involved in Las Vegas shooting?” “What do you think of the Hillary’s role in the Russian uranium scandal?” “What do you think about the information collected on Obama not being born in the US?”

Then, and only then can we begin our discussion.  Incredible!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I DON’T MIND BEING WRONG

I have stated that a major drawback to any relationship is having to be right.  This right/wrong issue hinges on irrational thinking, that somehow your belief will change something or someone.

Try telling an addict he has a problem.  Try telling a fat person they need to lose weight.  But don’t use the word fat.  Try it for health reasons and say that what you are eating is causing your unwanted weight gain. The pure overt logic  of your question is completely overlooked.

The well wishing concept is met with an internal dialogue from the other person something as follows:  “What gives you the right to lecture me?”  “What do you know about addiction?”  “I’m offended you think I’m fat?”  The internal irrationality seems endless.

In discussing any topic in any relationship the parties must start with some basic principles.  You must start with something you agree on.  This can become convoluted because if the topic has a hidden agenda you can’t stay on topic.

Let’s pretend you are President Obama and you blame all the problems on President Bush.  Some of the issues may be accurate and true but eight years later it seems a childish action.

With President Trump, one might bring up his misogynist statements or his stance on following the law.  Here is where the relationship or the dialogue ends.  Because although he has shown misogynist behaviors and following the law offends some people, the place where the discussion must begin is what standards did you apply in the past?

Did you call for President Clinton’s recognition with the litany of sexual harassment and assault charges filed against him?  Did you receive the FOIA requests you requested from the attorney general?  Did you receive the emails from Secretary of State Clinton?  How can we have a meaningful discussion if you cannot see the egregious behavior of your side when the other side’s behavior pales in comparison.

Politicians on both sides of the aisle fear you looking into their criminal activity.  I’m not sure why they have this fear because nothing ever comes from their misdeeds.

When justice sends those who committed misdeeds to jail a ripple effect takes place.  The political parties will no longer be a safe harbor for these crooks.  I would like to be wrong and find a Congressperson who has a house commensurate to the salary.  If I am wrong I’ll admit it.

 

IN THE MINORITY AND DIGGING IN

I wanted to research a topic and found that the cited information was incomplete at best, inaccurate at worst.   I found that dictionary words had different meanings than what older (more accurate/ non biased) dictionaries defined.  It became clear that research and science have been tainted.

What is the source and goal of this overt misinformation?  I don’t know because they don’t advertise.  The ad would have to look something like this:  New World Order seeks to misinform, to divert attention from bigger events by giving unwarranted power to undeserving people under the guise (choose one of the following) a. white males are subverting minorities b. LGBTQ needs to be taught in schools c.  terrorists do not exist except in the political arena d. Gore’s scientific and Nobel award winning prediction that we would be under water in 2015 is still on the table.

I don’t know the answers to many questions.  But trying to find a solid base to push from is impossible when so much is simply inaccurate and not true.  I could cite various articles but they appear opinions with references that are additional opinions.

I read these hate Trump rants and it is obvious that the information that is claimed by these ranters is false.  I get it — you don’t like Trump.  But don’t write such see through arguments that add meaning to fake information.

One can’t compare the words of Trump’s sexual power grabs to the lawsuits filed against Clinton let alone the deaths associated with the Clintons.  There was not the uproar then as there is now comparing words to deeds.

As I read these articles I think, the objective of the article is to convince me to come over to your side.  Well the language, the misinterpretations, the false claims substantiated by other false claimers  are not convincing me.  They make me take a deeper look at the other side.

The other side is not so good but compared to the projected moral high ground of these rants they look good.  You convinced me to lean to the right because they are less bad than you portray in your rants of hate.

I read a blog where the firing of a CNN reporter who called the president “a piece of shit” was  considered a blow to objective free speech.  Huh?

I read another blog that complained about the new health care bill.  They based their argument on the belief that Obama care works.  What planet does that algorithm work?

There is only one party.  The longer you refuse to acknowledge this the less prepared you will be in the upcoming crisis.  You can call the party the “money” party, the “big business” party or the “special interest” party/  They have conveniently labelled them Dem and Rep so you feel an attachment to your parents beliefs.

No health care bill will work where some one profits.  It has to be no profit.  They can figure out a better way to scam money under that system later.  I hope you don’t think 140 k a year job affords the kind of wealth and luxury our politicians enjoy.

The tipping point for me is the party that will not come to the table to hammer out ideas, the party that has sworn to oppose, the party that the silent minority — like me — will vote out of office next term.

Oh yeah, my research remains in limbo.

 

 

 

 

upcoming crisis

My Opinion Is Changing

I have always believed it strange that people running for a Congressional seat that pays $140k would spend millions to get that job.  At this point I was influenced by a statement (by a confidential source) “that ALL politicians are crooks.”  I stubbornly refused to believe them all to be crooks but certainly the majority of them.

Not being political but addicted to YouTube, I watch and listen to the arguing back and forth.  I hear the conspiracy theories and personally find them equal to statements made by Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, John McCain, Debbie Wasserman, and Chuck Shumer. “(McCain, Pelosi and Waters are demented, Wasserman is a psychopath and Shumer needs some special attention)

I live in a foreign country to the U.S.  I lost my internet for 7 weeks.  When I got it back, people remained as stupid as when I left.  Not that I am a paragon of intelligence or factual information but I am logical.  You know in the movies when they find arrows in the dead settlers and tribal feathers how it turns out the financial powers (railroad) needed the settlers to rise up against the Indians. Sometimes the number of attacks and the number of arrows do belong to the Indians.

The Clintons have left so many arrows in their victims that only a complete imbecile would defend, let alone state, that Hilary has America’s best interest at heart. She is evil — even by Muslim standards.  The people who support her (Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, John Podesta) all are morally bankrupt.

I said that I believed that all politicians are crooks.  I am prepared to stand by the majority of them as corrupt.  But after just two days of YouTube I amend my belief to add that Democrats are  also stupid.  Not a little stupid– really stupid.  And with principals that would make Satan himself proud.

During the Sessions testimony before Congress, after Comey revealed that there was no Russian collusion, the Democrat committee members kept peppering Sessions with Russian collusion.  Their agenda was blatant, uncalled for  and transparent.  The adage “when in a hole STOP digging”  apparently is not in the liberal playbook.

As the libtards each tried to out-snipe the previous libtard, they allowed Sessions to detail the wrong doings of Hilary and her protector Comey..  The Republicans asked the same questions but in a way to clarify what took place.  Even McCain made sense.  The Republicans looked so much better.

Case in point.  The Democrats made a big deal that Sessions would not reveal privileged communications with the president or of ongoing investigations.  They acted like this was a crime.  When Attorney General Holder refused to hand over DOCUMENTS, when Lois Lerner pled the fifth, that was okay.

My new opinion.  The vast majority of politicians are still crooks.  But the Republicans have a higher moral threshold.

FASCINATING

I watched the Congressional hearing with the FBI Director followed by the Department of State officials.  Most countries would not allow such free and open discourse.  England does.

This proved more exciting than one of those ID documentaries.  Asking direct questions, watching the Director Comey say one thing but come to another conclusion.  Watching the different Congressmen use a different style to expose the truth.  Watching the Democrats dodge the facts by dragging red herrings across the path of truth.

The bottom line to me:  Any reasonable person could take theses pieces of information and tack them to the death of the former UN  General Assembly president John Ashe death(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-02/un-official-accidentally-crushes-own-throat-right-testifying-against-Hillary-clinton  the Vince Foster death and the list of mysterious deaths of people who could blow the whistle on the Clintons and then elect that person president.  Sounds reasonable.

But that’s not the point of my writing today.  I decided to do some fact checking based on conversations with friends.  I wanted to know the cost of the White House staff under Michele Obama compared to others.  I wanted to know the cost for all the president’s vacations.

What I learned is that no one really knows because the numbers are stored under categories that hide the cost.  It appears that Michele has a staff of 22 at a cost of 1.6 million dollars per year compared to Hilary at 1.2 with a staff of 19  and Laura Bush with a staff of 18 that vacillated to 22 with an unknown cost.

Then I tried to find an article I read on a California lawsuit that showed that after all the California Democrat primsary votes were counted, that Sanders won 51 to 49 percent.  But the article is not to be found.  I did find that there is a law suit claiming voting fraud, the votes have not been fully tabulated but that Hillary still won by a very close margin without all the votes tabulated.

Something is not right.

I heard the reasons, I saw the expressions and I know in my sense of reason that Comey did not believe himself.  I must admit his performance proved exceptional but the truth won out.  Comey’s history will open your eyes.

The problem is simple to me and so is the solution.  On a big news day with two cop shootings, the president stirring up more divide, the Hillary lies under further review, the likelihood of non transparency so many other important stories go unnoticed.  Don’t protest AFTER the event.  Watch your elected officials BEFORE they get in office.

What about the dead American soldiers.  The president sends them to kill others, ruin families and lives, starve people, cause misery but we focus on a single event.  Well we should but very few know the hiring requirements of a local police officer let alone the fear they have on a daily basis.  Start there.  Pay attention.  Don’t elect known liars.

Since the election of Trump the amount of money apent on vacations is astronomical compared to the cited article.  President Trump sent Michele Obama a bill for 9 billion dollars.  Apparently the 100 plus people she hired, the two private jets, the yacht that were bought with tax payer dollars is not allowed.  Placing your mother on the pay roll did not work either.

The government will get the property back and the Obamas will be liable for usage,

Apparently Obama expected Hillary to win and knew she would not expose his federally funded vacations and security staff.  Well Trump won and flushed that scheme down the drain.

What I don’t understand is how we complain of a double standard, witness it, validate it and do nothing which perpetuates it.

,